- Have you communicated with XXX department at HQ?
- How frequently do you communicate with “Person X” within the XXX department at HQ?
- Do you feel that your communications with individuals at HQ lead to your success within the organization?
- Have you communicated with any individuals at other schools (not at your local level)?
- How frequently do you communicate with “Person X”?
- Do you feel that your communications with individuals at other schools lead to your overall success within the organization?
- How frequently do you communicate with XXX at your local level?
- Do you feel that your communications with individuals at your local school level lead to your overall success within the organization?
Sunday, June 5, 2016
Improving Communication within Online Public K-12 Education
Friday, November 15, 2013
Social Networks as a predictor for criminal behavior in Chicago
While Yale sociologists find social networks in victims of fatal shootings, the Chicago PD takes SNA in order to predict a "heat list"of likely shooters to reach out to. Fascinating and a bit troubling.
Sunday, December 4, 2011
Social business strategy – an example @ DELL
Hello,
I have come across an interesting article on a recent evolution in corporate strategy, the so-called social business strategy. The article presents the strategic approach of Dell on how to employ social media to a) communicate with customers, b) promote the flow of information in internal networks, and c) foster social innovation in the organization.
The index ranks companies according to their social media activity.
I strongly believe in order to be successful, organizations must define a strategy on how to leverage internal and external networks and how to effectively use social media technology. To achieve the required coverage in the organization, a social business strategy should be part of the corporate strategy definition.
Note: The article also talks about Dell’s efforts towards social responsibility (i.e. doing something for the greater good), which displays the problems in defining the magnitude of a social business strategy. Where does a company set the boundaries of its social business strategy? Is it limited to the use of social media to foster internal and external social networks? Or should it also include the corporate social responsibility (CSR) approaches of a company?
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Sunday, December 5, 2010
Social Networks Putting Kids at Risk.
With the increased use of social networks, it isn't surprising to find that the unsavory people of the world find ways to use the technology to dangerous ends. Unfortunately these people are targeting children and teenagers, and our kids are inadvertently helping them out. In September of this year, a 16 year old girl from Canada was drugged and raped by 7 males while at a party. While the event is disturbing enough, it was made worse by the fact that people took photos of the incident and posted it to social networking sites, such as Facebook [1]. These photos were uploaded to Facebook within hours, and while police were able to remove the photographs, it is known that they were downloaded prior to being removed. Unfortunately this is not an isolated event. In a recent study, it was found that 13% of kids interviewed had posted nude, or semi-nude photographs of themselves on the internet and 24% said they had signed onto someone else's account and accessed information without permission[2]. And these activities are not isolated incidents. News of child pornography rings being found through social networking sites are more and more common. Two recent examples include a ring of 11 people from Canada, Australia, and Britain being arrested because they were distributing child pornography via Facebook [3], and a second ring where more than 50 people have been arrested for using social networking technology to distribute child pornography [4].
So what is the problem, and are there any solutions? Very simply put, social networks are making it easier for child predators to not only access and distribute compromising photographs and videos of minors, but also that children and teenagers are supplying the material. Since criminals will always find ways to act illegally, ultimately any solution must be child focused. There are two schools of thought about potential solutions. One is to reduce access to social networking sites for minors by having age limits in place in order to use the site, and the other is to have parents be responsible for monitoring their child's internet activity [5][6]. In the US, the Bush administration tried to expand the 1998 Child Protection Act to require age limits to access sites that could be damaging to minors, but this policy was overturned and subsequently dismissed by the Supreme Court [7]. Therefore it is up to individual internet networking site to establish and enforce age limits. Facebook, mySpace, and other social networking sites have established age limit requirements, but many feel that they do not adequately enforce these limits [8].
On the other side of the argument, many people suggest that parents need to be more actively involved in monitoring how their children use the internet. They argue that it is the parent’s right and obligation to teach their children how to safely use the internet to avoid potential online threats. By educating children and establishing rules on how kids use the internet, many suggest that online threats can be reduced [9].
Because of the volatility and rapid advancement of the internet and associated technology, I think the possibility of creating and enforcing age restrictions to access sites would never be successful due to being ineffectual, or legally too restrictive. And ultimately, sick people will always find a way to satiate their desires, and kids will always find a way to access things they aren’t supposed to. While there is a risk of child predation on the internet, a significant amount could be reduced if children were taught how to appropriately use the internet and social networks. For instance, teach children to not accept friend requests from people they do not know, and also to inform our kids that once something is on the internet, it is nearly impossible to completely remove. The most important piece of the equation is how parents teach and monitor behavior, whether it is on the internet, at school, or in the mall. Censorship is not the answer, it will only cause more harm than good, and ultimately access to information empowers people. We just need to approach it with a little common sense.
[1] http://www.windsorstar.com/news/Photos+teen+gang+rape+viral+Internet/3536756/story.html
[2] http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/08/teens-on-social-networks.html#
[3] http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/08/27/facebook-child-pornography.html
[4] http://www.switched.com/2010/05/28/feds-bust-social-network-for-child-porn-collectors/
[5] http://www.geeksugar.com/Should-Age-Limit-Social-Networks-5974819
[7] http://www.pcworld.com/article/158061/us_high_court_refuses_internet_age_restrictions_case.html
Saturday, December 4, 2010
Social Networks – Sources of Emotional Stress?
The following paragraphs display some selected aspects of how social networks might also function as negative stress creators:
Ending of friendships – ’defriending’:
Once you registered for Facebook & Co., you start adding friend by friend; your community grows further and further. But what happens if one of your friends unilaterally decides to end the friendship? The psychiatrist Irene Levine from NYU School of Medicine states that ‘defriending’ can have very negative psychological consequences and will provoke emotional stress. This is especially true, since virtual friendships are unilaterally ended as opposed to most ‘normal’ friendships. In real life, friendships are more often ended in ‘mutual agreement’, thereby leaving fewer open questions unanswered.
Facebook triggers attacks for asthmatics
It might sound funny but this story really happened: A jealous 18 year old boy regularly had asthmatic attacks when logging in to Facebook. The reason was that he always expected his girlfriend having added still another male contact. The attacks became even worse when his girlfriend left him and deleted his contact from her profile. The doctors advised him to wear a mask to measure his respiratory volume. As soon as the young man connected to Facebook, his respiratory volume declined by more than 20%. After he stopped being on Facebook, no more asthmatic attacks have occurred since then. This case indicates that Facebook, and social networks in general, could be a new source of psychological stress, representing a triggering factor for exacerbations in depressed asthmatic individuals.
Social Networks addiction
In order to show the addiction potential of social networks, scientists from the University of Maryland carried out a test which was called ‘24 Hours: Unplugged’. Two hundred students agreed on not using social networks for 24 hours. The result of this study was astonishing. Many participants reported on having experienced agitation, extreme nervousness, tension and freakiness and – all of them being withdrawal symptoms similar to those usually related to alcohol and drugs.
Social pressure to connect & steady fear of missing something
US-psychologists found out that people of all ages feel pressure to be connected in social networks. But the pressure is so immense that the first users have left social networks again.
A recently published study of the Pew Internet & American Life Project discovered that 45 percent of all Americans are enthusiastic about being connected through social networks while 48 percent do not care about social networks at all. The most important group revealed by the study is the remaining 7 percent. They are neither interested in social nor do they refuse them at all. This group was identified as ‘ambivalent network users’. These users only participate in social networking because they fear to miss something. They are afraid leaving the networks, though they desire a break. The ultimate result is - again - emotional stress.
So, do we have now to be afraid of social networks creating emotional stress? I do not really think so.
The stress-aspects I listed above are only true for a limited number of persons in limited situations. If you feel addressed by one of these aspects, you should consider not using social networking platforms; there are other means to connect with friends and colleagues. Many social networkers, however, still seem to profit far more from their networks than being negatively influenced by the possible stress factors mentioned in my report.
References:
Social networks - forced to connect.
http://www.stern.de/digital/online/soziale-netzwerke-zum-vernetzen-gedraengt-660971.html
Stressed to be online all time.
http://www.bernerzeitung.ch/leben/gesellschaft/Der-Stress-staendig-online-zu-sein/story/16802717
Defriended, not de-emoted.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/05/fashion/05noticed.html
Facebook triggers asthmatic attacks.
http://www.welt.de/gesundheit/article11048217/Facebook-loest-bei-Asthmatiker-Anfaelle-aus.html
Social networks can provoke withdrawal syndroms.
http://www.pressemitteilungen-online.de/index.php/soziale-netzwerke-koennen-suchtartige-entzugserscheinungen-hervorrufen/
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Influence of Social Networks on Human Migration
Dear Readers,
Being an immigrant, human migration has been a topic of interest to me. I believe that social networks play a significant role in human migration.
The positive influences of social networks on human migration are:
- Informal social networks help to spread information and instil a culture of mobility that penetrates individual decisions.
- Social networks provide information on migration and life abroad. So migration is directed towards places where social contacts are located – Information hypothesis, Ritchey (1976).
- Social networks provide support, e.g. by lending money or helping to find a job in the place of destination – Facilitating hypothesis, Ritchey (1976).
- Social networks reduce the short term costs of settlement while shaping other variables related to the migration process: decision to migrate, direction of the flows, transnational links, settlement patterns and incorporation.
- Social networks are crucial in the post migration process such as finding jobs and accommodation, circulating goods and services, as well as psychological support and continuous social and economic information.
- The costs and risks for new migrants are lower if they maintain social relations with relatives in a country of destination.
- Social networks promote migration as a result of family reunification and family formation (The spouses joining their migrant partners as well as the migrants seeking partners from their communities back home).
- Social networks also promote reverse migration to the origin countries and help in bringing back financial capital, knowledge, skills and ideas.
The negative influences of social networks on human migration are:
- If the density of the network of friends and the family in the origin society is high, then it is possible that these networks also reduce migration – Affinity Hypothesis, Ritchey (1976).
- The inter-dependency of some of the ethnic social networks is so high that even after the migration, the migrants tend to interact and live within those networks. This gives rise to isolation among communities in a society which in the extreme case leads to ghettoes.
The above influences can be found well illustrated in the links below:
While doing a Google search on the causes of human migration, I came across the following link:
While doing a Google search on human migration examples, I came across the following links:
http://www.cies.iscte.pt/documents/CIES-WP12.pdf
http://www.nidi.knaw.nl/en/output/2004/jems-30-02-heering.pdf/jems-30-02-heering.pdf
http://www.chicagobooth.edu/research/workshops/orgs-markets/docs/FeiQin-ReturnMigration.pdf
http://www.bos.frb.org/economic/nerr/rr1997/spring/glsr97_2.htm
http://www.jstor.org/pss/621990
Based on my personal experience as well as experiences from my social network connections, I found many of the above influences being true.