A Proposed Social Network Analysis of
European Bilateral Trade Flows- Cian McCarthy
I will be taking the second half of the class.
I will be taking the second half of the class.
The European Economic Community, later to
become the European Union, was established to create a common market of goods
and promote an “ever closer union” between the states of Europe. A primary focus of the original establishing
document, the Treaty of Rome, was to create an economic interdependence among
the countries of Europe which would mitigate the threat of war, as increased
trade would lead to increased cooperation. I want to use Social Network
Analysis to see the extent to which the European Single Market has truly
brought together the European nations, or if perhaps there are still clusters
of countries, or remote nations with little trading activity with the rest of
the Union. This analysis is important because those clusters or isolates would
create the foundations for tension within the community and would challenge the
interdependence and economic cooperation that is at the core of the EU.
All European countries have some level of trade with others, but it’s
the value of that trade that matters. For my analysis I will use a valued
network of incremental degrees to create the network map of bilateral trade flows between every European country, with
every other European country. I will then compare the network over time, most
likely before significant moments for the single market (mass admissions, introduction
of Euro etc.) to see how these moments affected the trade network of the Union.
Visually, I think it would be quite powerful to place each node on a map of
Europe, and the ties between the nodes will represent the level of trade
between two countries (e.g. thickness increasing with value). By doing both
visual and quantitative comparisons between different periods of time, I think
I will be able to paint an interesting picture of the evolution of trade and
integration of Europe over the last half-century.
Inspiration for this idea came from
a previous Social Network Analysis of international trade done by the Centre D’études Prospectives et D’informations
Internationale. In their paper, Network
Analysis of World Trade using the BACI-CEPII dataset (link),
they briefly dealt with European trade flows, and created the following
model:
I think this is a really interesting
diagram, as it shows a core group of countries which are central to the
European trade network, and many others on the periphery. I want to build on
their analysis to create a more comprehensive impression of trade networks in
Europe.
If during my analysis I find that
countries do tend to cluster, then I will posit some questions over the nature
of the clustering. Do countries tend to group by language? By the wealth of their
citizens? Or is it merely geographic convenience that explains why some
countries trade more with each other? And most importantly, my question will
look at the impact of EU and Eurozone participation in increasing economic
interdependence and cooperation throughout the continent. I’ll also look into
the trade of specific commodities and groups of commodities to see whether the
network in relation to one is different to that of the other, or the overall
trade network. This analysis could be potentially very valuable to scholars and
practitioners interested in fostering economic cooperation. Understanding the
network of European trade flows would be the first step towards breaking down cliques
and factions and fostering overall, universal, economic integration.
The data I will use is the IMF
international trade data. From this, I can create a 1 mode directed data set which
measures a countries trade flow with each other country. I can then use UCINET and
NetDraw to create a network map to visualise and analyse the European trade
network. I think I can get some interesting results.
3 comments:
We've certainly discussed this, but I'm disappointed to see your post that has no real research question, no network, and no real insight into why SNA is the analytical system of choice here. I have no doubt that you'll "be able to paint an interesting picture of the evolution of trade and integration of Europe over the last half-century," but what will your analysis show? You could have taken ideas from the paper you cite--and others. Now that you've landed on a topic, it's time to do some in-depth research and thinking. You'll get there.
I forgot to mention--this looks like an awesome data set. All the more reason to zero in on the network aspests.
And what about the lobbying data set I sent you the link to? Looks even more interesting. See if FAS will share it with you.
Post a Comment