(Jessica Tsang)
Background: Human
Trafficking is an alarming global phenomenon. In Boston, law enforcement
officials are stepping up efforts to find human trafficking rings, and to
protect victims[i].
With the overwhelming nature of the crime, tools such as SNA can be used to
help law enforcement make sense of the data, and outline the networks, so that
information can be used efficiently, and interventions can be planned
intelligently, and safely.
Research
Question: Are
organized crime groups in Boston using the same networks for drug trafficking
and sex trafficking, or are the networks specialized?
Hypothesis: There is an overlap in networks
for selling drugs and human beings. Established criminal networks could utilize
their connections for trafficking in similar ways, regardless of which
commodity is being moved.
Alternative
hypothesis:Networks could be more specialized
for certain cover businesses, such as massage parlors. Some massage parlors in
Chinatown have proven to be fronts for sex trafficking[ii]. This
type of trafficking is probably more specialized, to massage parlor owners, and
victims coming from Asia. There are probably fewer overlaps to drug activity or
gang activity in this type of network.
Data: It would be difficult to get all
of the necessary data to properly analyze the networks, which is a common
problem when studying sex trafficking. An ideal place to start would be with
arrest records for sex trafficking charges in Boston, as well as arrest records
for drug offenses in Boston. It would be interesting to collect data both on
buyers and sellers, to see if customers overlap as well (customers could be a
phase II project if necessary). In addition to getting the data, a challenge
would be the sheer size of the network. Looking at sex trafficking alone (and
eliminating other forms of human trafficking) would help to limit the scope a
bit. Ideally, this data would be provided through a partnership with local law
enforcement officials, who are already engaged in fighting human trafficking,
and looking for better ways to target their resources.
It would also be useful to have
cell phone and email data, in order to establish connections between perpetrators,
and to determine information flows and directionality. This would probably need
to be done once the network is established, and possibly limited to certain
important nodes (due to the sheer volume of information and the difficulty in gaining
access to it). It may be possible instead to establish connections through
attribute data, such as address, phone number, or affiliation with certain
gangs or criminal groups.
Attribute data that would be
desired for everyone in the network would include, but not be limited to:
·
Gender
·
Age
·
Nationality
·
Legal status in the U.S.
·
Previous legal offenses
·
Any known affiliations to organized crime or gangs
·
Address
·
Phone number
·
Location/Method used for the sale/purchase
(street-based, hotel/house-based, online, massage parlor)
Analysis: To analyze the network, all data would
be loaded into UCINET and NetDraw. The first task would simply be to establish
the network. Next, it would be important to see which nodes have arrest records
for both drug-related offenses and sex trafficking offenses. The percentage of
nodes with overlapping charges would be a good indicator of how much overlap
exists in the network between drug trafficking and sex trafficking. It would be
particularly interesting to isolate the group with overlapping charges and to
examine that network more closely based on whether each node was charged with
selling (drugs or sex) or facilitating trafficking, or buying (drugs or sex). This
would provide some information about the flow and directionality of the
criminal activities. Across the whole network, it would be helpful to look at
various pieces of attribute data to determine the make up of the network. Gender
would be a good starting point – to determine if the network is male dominated,
or whether there is more female participation than expected. Examining
nationality and age would provide key demographic information, and may establish
patterns. Looking at the location/method of the offense (such as massage
parlors) would be important in relation to any overlaps with drug charges. It
would be crucial to look for patterns, based on the type of location/method,
between location/method and overlaps or lack of overlaps. It would also be
crucial to examine any data on affiliations with gangs or criminal groups, to
look for patterns. On the network level, centrality measures should be
calculated to determine the density of the network.
At the node level,
centrality measure should be calculated, and examined more closely. They should
be used in conjunction with analysis of key ego networks, factions, and
cliques. Faction and clique analysis will be useful to provide specific groups
that could be targeted by law enforcement. One hypothesis is that factions and cliques
would form based on affiliation with a criminal group – it is likely that a
particular law enforcement unit is already aware of that group, and has specialized
knowledge which could be used to determine the best strategy moving forward in
terms of a raid, arrests, etc. Ego networks of key players may be able to show
links between different parts of the network, which might explain movement
along the supply chain. To determine key individuals, centrality measures
should be assessed. Important measures include: betweenness, Eigenvector, and
closeness. Someone with high betweenness could be seen as a “gatekeeper”[iii] or a broker, and could be a very significant node in
the network. Someone with high Eigenvector would be well connected to influential
nodes in the network, and therefore might either be a leader in the network, or
might provide access to leaders in the network. A node with a low closeness
provides many connections to other nodes in the network – so interviewing that
one individual could provide a wealth of information.
Conclusion: This SNA project would
provide a better understanding of the existing networks in Boston used for sex
trafficking. Gaining insight into this network can have many benefits, particularly
for law enforcement agencies trying to fight this crime. Understanding the
links between drug trafficking and sex trafficking, or criminal organizations
and trafficking, can help police target their interventions and raids
appropriately. It also allows for information sharing across specialized police
units, such as those working on human trafficking, and DEA agents working on
drug crime. It may illuminate patterns with regards to certain gangs or
criminal organizations that are already under surveillance for other crimes. It
could also provide surprising results, which might highlight holes in the
current strategy for dealing with this growing problem. Some of the conclusions
reached in the analysis may make it possible to create tailored prevention
programs that could interrupt the trade and perhaps protect some victims.
[i] Fox
News Boston, Human Trafficking Rings too
Close to Home, February 12, 2015. Accessed October 22, 2015.
Available at: http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/28090179/human-trafficking-rings-too-close-to-home
[ii] Kathy
Curran, 5 Investigates undercover finds prostitution,
‘human trafficking’: Massage parlors raided by Boston Police, November 24,
2014. Accessed October 22, 2015. Available at: http://www.wcvb.com/news/5-investigates-undercover-finds-prostitution-human-trafficking/29888320
[iii] Cockbain and Brayley, Internal child sex trafficking: Exploring
cooffending and co-victimisation through social network analysis, November 3,
2011. Accessed October 22, 2015. Available at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdi/events/int-CIA-conf/ICIAC11_Slides/ICIAC11_1B_ECockbain
1 comment:
A bit unclear how you'd go from arrest records to a network at first -- maybe using the snowball method to look at their cellphone records to find their main contacts, then cross-reference with other arrest records. Overall, good job.
-MIranda
Post a Comment