Evaluating and
Improving Janaagraha’s civic awareness program
I will be taking the second half of the module and will be working on
the WEF Project.
Background:
‘Janaagraha’ is a non- profit
organization based in Bangalore, India that facilitates various programs to
foster civic awareness amongst citizens. One such program is called ‘Bala
Janaagraha’ in which Grade 8 students across schools enrolled in the program are
taught civic awareness and citizen rights based on a curriculum set by
Janaagraha. Once the school is enrolled, it’s mandatory for the Grade 8 students
to study the curriculum and pass the tests. The program includes class room
learning as well as projects undertaken by these students which reflect a good
understanding of civic awareness.
The main objective of Bala Janaagraha is
to empower the Indian youth in understanding the power of citizen rights,
proper governance and a better quality of life. Every six months, the quality
of the Bala Janaagraha program is evaluated based on feedback from the
facilitators of the program as well as from the students across schools enrolled
in the program which is conducted by surveys. The structure of the survey that’s
rolled out to students is primarily built around the curriculum of the program
as a test of their understanding. An effective way of measuring the impact of
this program is being conducted through pre-and post-surveys (both surveys
having the same questions but the pre-survey is targeted to students prior to
the start of the Bala Janaagraha program and the post survey aimed at Grade 9
students who have completed the program in the previous year). The responses
are then analyzed to see how effective the Bala Janaagraha program has been in
educating students about civic and governance issues (measured by the number of
questions answered correctly by both groups- the students who took the pre-survey
and those who took the post survey).
I worked in Janaagraha over the summer
and conducted a Monitoring and Evaluation of the Bala Janaagraha program across
15 schools enrolled in the program. Based on the results of the pre-and post-surveys
across these 15 schools there was a significant difference in the results between
the two groups. Those who had completed the Bala Janaagraha program performed
better than those who hadn’t been through the program.
Given the effectiveness of the program, I’m
interested in considering how Bala Janaagraha can tailor their curriculum based
on the interests of the students around a broad range of issues to understand the
trends around students and issues and how Bala Janaagraha can use it as a leverage
to address other pressing issues of equal importance but lack considerable
awareness.
Using
SNA Analysis:
SNA Analysis can be used in connecting
these 2 groups of students across schools by issues that resonate with them. The
network would be a two- node matrix classified based on attributes and issues.
The measures I would use as a part of my SNA Analysis would be degree centrality
including betweeness to understand the structure of the Bala Janaagraha team-
how the various students relate to their facilitators, which facilitator
controls the curriculum and program across schools. I would also use factions
to analyze the network based on subgroups- the subgroups being schools and if
there are similarities amongst students across certain schools and whether the
facilitator in charge of the schools has any affect or if there are any other
factors despite the standardized curriculum across schools. I would also look
at in and out degree between facilitators and the students to understand the
flow of communication and among the facilitators to determine whether they are
well coordinated.
Data
Required:
The data required would be a list of Grade 8 and Grade
9 students enrolled in the program. In addition to the pre-and post-survey
data, we would need an additional survey with student responses to their issue
of interest, their gender, whether they have been directly or indirectly affected
by the issue of their concern, have they undertaken a project that addresses any
issue of their concern. We would also need a list of the facilitators in charge
of running the program across schools and their attributes.
Based on the responses of the surveys, SNA will help
me determine how well connected facilitators are with their students, whether
there’s coordination across schools in maintaining the same standard across
schools. It would also provide insight into whether the program can be better organized
to help facilitators understand key issues that students are interested in and
maybe undertake projects that have a deeper value to those students. It can
also help identify gaps in the curriculum that don’t address issues in as much
detail as it should to address those of key interest articulated by students in
their surveys.
References:
http://www.balajanaagraha.org/
1 comment:
A worthwhile project to do when you can. I like the idea of two 2-mode datasets (student to issues and students to facilitators) Would have been nice to see more thinking on how centrality measures, singly or combined, could be used to flesh out leadership, both on the thought and social levels. Like the idea of using an SNA to tailor curriculum; needs a bit more thinking and detail.
Post a Comment