The security directors of multinational companies
must manage risks related to physical security, business continuity,
intellectual property protection, local corruption and crisis response, among
others. Given that many MNC's are now larger economic entities than some countries, managing these types of threats at the corporate level is becoming comparable to running the security of a small country.
How can SNA help a corporate security department whose success relies
on cross-department and international collaboration?
Hypothesis: SNA will help the department (1) know what its
resources are in the first place; (2) Facilitate collaboration by bringing
together resources that should be connected sooner.
The ultimate goal is to make the company more prepared for
and resilient against crisis situations.
Data required:
The data-collection phase should begin with an assessment of
the skills that are critical to the corporate security department achieving its
goals. What kind of people should the department have inside it? Speak to
frequently? Have access to?
I anticipate surveying along the following attributes and
connection topics:
1.
Identifying and defining your resources:
a.
Identifying attributes:
i. Department
ii. Location
iii. Gender
iv. Title
v. Age
b.
Experience attributes:
i. Years
with company
ii. Undergraduate
degree
iii. Graduate
degree
iv. Journalism
v. Law
enforcement
vi. Military
vii. Government
viii.
Law
ix. Academia
x. Corporate
security
xi. Residence
in countries where the business has operations
c.
Skill attributes:
i. Languages
ii. Certifications
(CFE, CAMS, PPI, etc.)
iii. Investigations
iv. Security
consulting
v. Political
risk analysis
d.
Expertise attributes:
i. Industries
(oil & gas, pharmaceuticals, mining, legal, etc.)
ii. Regions
(Middle East, South Asia, etc.)
iii. Issues
that matter to critical business functions or corporate strategy (business
continuity, travel security, corruption, problem solving etc.)
2.
Describing the existing network:
a.
Patterns of communication:
i. Have
never communicated
ii. Communicate
with occasionally (once per week or less, group meetings)
iii. Communicate
with frequently (more than once per week)
b.
Patterns of collaboration:
i. Have
worked with on a client engagement in the past year
ii. Have
not worked with on a client engagement in the past year
Important network
measures:
- Network density: Cross-departmental collaboration on project work (density of networks on issues/regions/collaborations that make sense, such as Middle East political analysis, oil & gas security)
- Ego networks: which employees do the best job of connecting departments on projects.
- Organizational holes: lack of personnel with attributes necessary to satisfy specific corporate requirements; missing connections between employees who should be speaking more frequently (is there a security analyst with years of experience in China but now based in Wisconsin who has never spoken with the China country manager?)
What will this help the
company do?
Ideally, the SNA will result in intelligence that allows the department to:
- Create more effective project teams.
- Identify people who aren’t talking who should be.
- Identify areas where the company is over or under-resourced on critical skills and personnel.
- Identify organizational vulnerabilities (bottlenecks; central people who if removed would have a significant negative effect on the company’s ability to get things done).
1 comment:
Excellent, Tanya. From the Question, to the hypothesis, through the data needed and the analisis to be performed: a "soup-to-nuts" description of what would be a really interesting SNA, especially for a company whose success can be measured by how information flows to it and through it.
Enjoyed having you in the course and your many contributions throughout.
Post a Comment