Background
The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy markets itself as a
training ground for future leaders in the public, private, and NGO sectors. The
unique advantage of Fletcher – the marketing suggests - is its ability to
identify potential leaders and equip them with the skills and connections to
self-actualize. According to its literature, “Connections made at Fletcher
impact the academic, personal and professional lives of our alumni over the
course of a lifetime”, noting that it is distinct amongst its peer institutions
for its “collaborative, cross-disciplinary approach to identifying and
illuminating those connections.”
Objective
The Offices of Career Services and Alumni Relations have
alumni data suggesting that the institution is successful in training managers
in government, business and non-profits. However, I’m curious about the
experience of students while at Fletcher – how can students use their limited
time in graduate school to best impact their academic, personal and
professional lives? The purpose of this study is to provide the administration
strategic guidance as they review Fletcher’s academics and programs to ensure
alignment with the School’s mission and that the students’ needs are being met.
The analysis will be of interest to students, as well, as it will suggest whether
students are best leveraging their peer networks.
Research Questions
Does the student body represent the diversity that Fletcher
supposedly embodies, including student with multi-sectorial backgrounds and
strategic, cross-sector networks? And are these ties being made at Fletcher,
itself? Based on my own observational data, the student body is smart,
interesting and fun, and undoubtedly enriches my life. Are we successful,
however, in engaging each other to help fulfill our goals?
Methodology
In collaboration with the Fletcher administration, Office of
Career Services, and Student Council representation, I will design and conduct
a qualitative survey.
Possible questions include:
1.
What was your professional experience prior to
Fletcher?
·
Organization(s)
·
Sector(s)
·
Title(s)
·
Location(s)
·
Skills/responsibilities
·
Do you know anyone that wants to hold a position
at your previous organization(s)?
2.
What is your ideal position after graduating
from Fletcher?
·
Organization(s)
·
Sector(s)
·
Title(s)
·
Location(s)
·
Skills/responsibilities of desired position(s)
·
Do you know anyone at Fletcher that held a
position at your desired organization(s)?
3.
Interviewee background
·
Degree
·
Year
·
Fields of Study (if applicable)
·
Have you interests changed since matriculation?
(i.e. fields of study, desired org/sector/location, etc.)
·
Student club(s)
·
Country of citizenship
·
Regional interest
Naturally, the list is preliminary and not exhaustive. A
limitation of the survey will be sampling. Ideally, we’d have 100% compliance
amongst the student body, but this expectation is unrealistic. I’ve initiated
discussions and believe I will have institutional support to encourage uptake.
Analysis
From the data collected from the aforementioned survey,
we’ll be able to analyze whether students with specific career goals are
connecting with students with relevant backgrounds. Additional questions that the data will illuminate
(and potentially provide directional answers to) include: How big of “career changes”
do students hope to make post-Fletcher? Are there particular sectors that are over
or under represented (particularly in relation to Fletcher’s faculty and/or
programs)? Does the functional skill training implicit in a Fletcher education
and across the particular fields of study align with the desired employee
outcomes?
Next Steps
I welcome comments, advice, and constructive criticism –
both regarding the scope of the project and the particular way that I’m
executing it. I want the deliverable to be of interest to the Fletcher
community, which includes many readers of this blog. In the Fletcher (and
social network) spirit, I believe in the wisdom of crowds.
I should also mention that I have the good fortune of working on this project with two esteemed colleagues, Gustavo & Michael.
1 comment:
This is OK, but where's the network? You talk about ties and connections, and students engaging each other, yet the survey you describe is pretty much a standard, node-based one, with the exception of the two "holds a positon" questions, which are themselves somewhat ambiguous. And where's any mention of SN analytical tools? As we discussed, I support this idea totally, but it's going to take some work to come up with a compelling and persuasive document for the various constituencies. The SCQ framework I introduced in class is a good place to start.
Post a Comment