How did the early social networks amongst early Liberian
settlers affect long-term development outcomes?
Background
After slave trade was abolished in the early 1800s, many
slaves brought to the United States from the colonies were repatriated in West
Africa. Over a period of 50 years, Liberia transformed from a slave colony,
used primarily to export slaves to the new world, into an ex-slave colony. The
initial settlers were mostly freed slaves who assumed important roles as
emissaries from the US, commissioned by the American Colonization Society.
Americo-Liberians, as they came to be known, distinguished themselves from the
indigenous populations by creating institutions modeled on those they had
become accustomed to in the US. Soon after the declaration of independence in
1847, the Republic of Liberia became the first independent African state with a
new “elite” or “ruling” class of individuals that divided the society into
various factions. Identity became a focal issue in the division of power
between different factions: Americo-Liberians, though few in number, came to
dominate politically and financially. These divisions in society are often
cited as the main reason for Liberia’s two civil wars.
Objective
Using social network analysis of census data collected prior
to Liberia’s independence, I hope to achieve three things:
a)
Examine
how the network evolved over time as new settlers were repatriated into the
colony from the US;
b)
Analyze
the determinants underlying the determinants of factions over time and some of
the basic elements that distinguished these factions;
c)
Hypothesize
and test whether there are any links to the dynamics of the social networks and
the long-term development outcomes of different areas in Liberia.
Methodology
The 1843 census of Liberia has basic socio-demographic data
along with a module that records whom each person in the census knew. I intend
to create two separate datasets: a one-node matrix with (directional)
relationships between the full sample of individuals in the census and an
attributes file with individual node characteristics. I will then examine the
natural sub-groups (factions) that form and generate group level measures on
centrality and closeness.
Hypothesis
Long-run outcomes are poorer in places where there are
factions forming in the social network.
Potential limitations
The
endogeneity of the social network makes it an empirical challenge to identify
the causal impacts of factions on long-term development. Nevertheless, an
analysis of the evolution of the network over time and (potentially across
space) may make provide useful insight into the complex hierarchies that have
formed within networks and between groups.
1 comment:
We've discussed, and you know how enthusiastic I am, so all I need to say now that I've seen it in writing is simple, elegant, and fascinating. But also a challenge given the age of the data and the complexities of identification of individuals and families. I look forward to seeing the work develop.
Post a Comment