Hey everybody,
  I posted this article via E-Mail already as the blogspot server was down. Here is the same posting again.
  I found this article "Leading through networks" at the homepage  of IMD:  http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/ea8374a6-dc3f-11db-a21d-000b5df10621,dwp_uuid=5bd47902-91db-11db-a945-0000779e2340.html#axzz1ME87Zti0  and there is also a video to it:
    The three main points of the articles are:
    1.Simple hierarchies and complex networks.
2. The two basic kinds of networks that every leader needs: fishing nets for collecting the right kind of resources and safety nets for risk taking.
3. Closing thought: Do you have the right nets and are you using them correctly?
  2. The two basic kinds of networks that every leader needs: fishing nets for collecting the right kind of resources and safety nets for risk taking.
3. Closing thought: Do you have the right nets and are you using them correctly?
   The article is covering many points that the "Hoppe-Reinelt"  article did and additionally explains the need for networks for leaders in  general. I found it very interesting! (I attached the article below)
     See you in class,
     Wolfram (P6)
  Part 2: Transcript
    Published: March 27 200709:49| Last updated: March 27 200709:49
       Professor Martha Maznevski: We’re here at IMD’s restaurant,  called The Meeting Place, to emphasise networking. Leading through networks  is critically important in global firms. Hierarchies are, of course,  important. Hierarchies help us to understand where the lines of decision  making and authority are. It’s important in global firms that the  hierarchies are clear, but relatively simple. As we talked about yesterday,  if they’re too complicated then nobody knows where to go to for advice  or for decision making. But to complement those clear, simple hierarchies,  it’s important to have networks. Networks are systems of relationships  that cross boundaries across the network, outside the organisation, in order  to pass on information and influence to get things done.
       Okay, you know what organisational charts look like in the picture of the  hierarchy. Let’s take a quick look at what a picture of a network  looks like. Here’s an example of a network. This is the flow of  information and communications in a key account team of a global financial  services organisation. You can see in this team which is actually the flow  of the communications, how they talk to each other, who talks to whom about  the account. This looks quite different from an organisation chart. In fact  it’s difficult to tell in this picture who is the boss or the managing  director of this team. In fact it’s number one, it’s this person  here, but this is not the same person who receives most of the  communication. So, the hierarchy helps understand where the decision making,  accountability and authority are. But looking at this helps us to understand  where the communication flows are, and it helps this team to assess whether  or not the right people are talking to the right people.
       Now, every global leader needs two basic kinds of networks, and  it’s best to think of these as fishing nets and safety nets. We use  fishing networks, so networks of humans, to catch all kinds of resources.  Obviously to catch ideas, to catch innovations, but also to catch people,  for example new recruits, new candidates for your organisation. Also to  catch customers; we can use fishing nets to catch customers, to catch  suppliers, alliance partners, financing partners. Any kind of resource that  your company needs can be fished through a human fishing net. The  characteristics of a good human fishing net are similar to those of a good  real fishing net; for example, you want the connections to be as far apart  as possible. In other words, if everybody in your fishing net knows  everybody else in your fishing net, then you’re just catching the same  information or the same resources over and over again. It’s much more  efficient to have connections that do not know each other, and then the  connections should be spread over as large an area as possible, and the net  should be cast in the right place. So, for example, if you’re looking  for financial resources, and your fishing net is cast over university  researchers, you’re probably not going to catch the right  resources.
       Let’s take a look at one company’s fishing net. This is the  fishing net of a global engineering firm, and the different colours  represent people who are in different countries spread across the world. The  lines represent knowledge paths, so these are people who know about each  other’s work, and therefore tend to share knowledge along these paths.  We see that, in general, this is a pretty efficient fishing net, that  knowledge about engineering applications in different parts of the world can  pass around the world through some of these key connections. On the other  hand, there are a couple of people down here who happen to specialise in  pharmaceutical plant applications in Latin Americathat are not connected to  the rest of the net. And if somebody over here needs to know about  pharmaceutical applications they’re not going to be able to get the  knowledge. So, when the company saw a picture of this fishing net, they knew  that it was important to create some ties between these people and the rest  of the net in order to fish better for their ideas.
       So, the fishing net is the first kind of net that all global managers  need to catch resources. The other kind of net that is important is a safety  net. A safety net, for example the ones used by trapeze artists or tightrope  artists in circuses, catches you when you fall. The characteristics of a  good safety net are that the holes are smaller, so that nothing falls  through, the ties are very, very strong, and they’re also very  flexible. Other things being equal, safety nets can be smaller than fishing  nets because they have to catch something in a very specific area. Human  safety nets do the same thing. These are our networks of very strong, close,  trusting relationships. These are the people that we can discuss things with  and try out new ideas with. For example, I’m thinking of launching  this new service idea next week, but I’m really worried about how some  of the employees might take it because it’s going to change how they  work together; what do you think, how should I do that? That’s the  kind of question you can ask your safety net. Also, if something fails, your  safety net is the group of people that catch you and bounce you back up  again. Because global management is so full of complexities and risks  it’s important to have a strong safety net.
       Let’s take a look at one person’s safety net. In this case  this is a private banker in Moscow. And, for his business in private banking  he really needs to have everybody in his network knowing each other very,  very well, so that he has a safety net through which he can do business, to  catch him in the uncertainties and the unpredictabilities of the market that  he’s in. When he saw this network he was quite excited, because this  is exactly the kind of business that he feels he needs in order to be  effective. His safety net is for doing business; his fishing net is a  different network.
       So, all global managers need both fishing nets and safety nets. And I  would ask you think about two questions. The first one is: do you have the  right fishing nets and safety nets? In other words, are you set up to catch  the right resources, and also to take risks and use your safety net? The  second question is: are you using them?
       CopyrightThe  Financial Times Limited 2011. You may share using our article tools. Please  don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the  web.
    
 
No comments:
Post a Comment