Overview
In the Fall of 2007, I embarked on a semester long stay in
France as part of an exchange program placing me at an international relations
program in Strasbourg. The program – ERASMUS (European Community Action Scheme
for the Mobility of University Students) – left an indelible impression on me
as the most transformative and unforgettable experience I’ve had to date. As a
topic that is close to my heart, the ERASMUS program at IEP Strasbourg gathered
students from 10 European countries, the United States, Canada and Australia to
study for a year in a country and an educational system much different from
their own. The goal of the ERASMUS
program is to connect European students with one another, build cross-cultural
relationships across language and national identity, and to train young leaders.
One of the uniting factors in the 2007-8 ERASMUS program (other than our
language proficiency in French) was that we were all pursuing degrees in the
international affairs or public policy field.
A possible research question could analyze whether the program influenced participants (by their time there and the connections they made) to
pursue actually internationally focused careers post-graduation? What would be interesting to find
out is whether there is a correlation between who kept in touch with who based
off of certain characteristics.
Another research question to ask is: was the experience as
transformative for them as well? It would be easy just to chalk up ongoing
correspondence to the friendships forged in Strasbourg, but again it would be
interesting to see if patterns exist (if any) regarding attributes of life after
ERASMUS.From this angle of the “transformative” nature of the ERASMUS program, I would be curious to analyze if cross-cultural, cross-sectoral and cross-lingual (native) ties were established and maintained five years after the program. Doing a social network analysis of this group would be really helpful in finding the answers to these questions, most importantly these three: whether these connections exemplified the goals of the ERASMUS program, whether people are now in internationally-focused careers (or headed in that direction) and if the program was personally transformative (in terms of the qualitative aspects of the relationships forged during the program) for the participants.
Hypothesis
I hypothesize that the majority of people will have kept in contact with people who share the same native language and possibly, but not necessarily, the same country. There might be variation in terms of what sectors will have significant connections, but the public sector and international/multilateral organization sector may have the most interconnections or might have cliques, based on the focus of academic study in our ERASMUS program. Of course, the most obvious connections will be with those who spent the most time together during the program and formed friendships. But, again, my question is did they meet people based on interest and then carry that relationship to their professional lives.
Methodology
The one-mode nodes of analysis would be the participants
themselves (ideally all the ones for 2007-2008, regardless of whether they
spent a semester or a year in Strasbourg). The ties would represent the top 3
people from the program that participants keep in contact with the most. Centrality
measures will be important to determine whether certain people are linked with
others regarding current professional sector, native language, country,
education and other attribute characteristics. All of these characteristics and the proposed
survey questions are listed below.
Data, for the most part, would be moderately easy to obtain
if everyone responds to the survey. Unfortunately, one of my close friends from
the program is no longer with us and the data set would not give a complete picture
of all the participants in the 2007-8 IEP Strasbourg ERASMUS program. Assuming
everyone would respond back to the survey, the data set in UCINet and the network
map in NetDraw would be manageable to upload and analyze.
Since the three main goals are transformative experience
(through different connections), internationally-focused careers among the
participants, and meeting the mission of the ERASMUS program, there are certain
questions we need to ask. Aside from personal friendships, did we keep in touch
with each other based on other factors, such as similar career/professional
paths by sector? Did participants go on to have international careers or
domestic careers? Does our ongoing communication really depend on our native
languages and countries of origin? Did pursuing a higher degree have an impact
on the ongoing relationships forged?
Proposed Survey
Questions
Network QuestionWho are the top 3 people you stay in touch with the most?
Attribute Data
Questions
1.
What country are you from?a. United States
b. Canada
c. Norway
d. Iceland
e. Spain
f. Italy
g. Ireland
h. UK
i. Australia
j. Poland
k. Sweden
l. Latvia
m. Germany
2.
What is your first (native) language? Please
select one.
a.
Englishb. French
c. Spanish
d. Norwegian
e. Icelandic
f. Polish
g. Italian
h. Russian
i. German
3.
What sector do you currently work in?
a.
Private/for-profitb. Non-profit
c. Public/government
d. International/multilateral organization
e. Grad student
f. Academia
4.
Do you currently work abroad from your home
country?
a.
Domesticb. Abroad
5.
Did you pursue a higher degree (Masters, MBA,
Law) after ERASMUS?
a.
Yesb. No
6.
Does your job currently involve international
travel?
a.
Yesb. No
7.
Do you interact with international colleagues/counterparts
in your current job?
a.
Yesb. No
As the project develops, there may be additional attribute
questions added in order to pick up relevant characteristics essential to
understanding our post-ERASMUS ties.
1 comment:
This is a good idea and might be valuable to the ERASMUS powers-that-be. The problem lies in your paragraph that starts "Data would be moderately easy to obtain..." I am a hardened skeptic about alumni surveys, but perhaps there's something different about these people and their shared experience?
One test is how many surveys, etc. you get yourself from the program. Any chance they'd let you piggy-back on one they are already doing, if they are? You've got to be creative about this, and you'll need a Plan B...
Post a Comment