The emergence of impact investors who invest in firms and
organizations that seek to create social impact over the past two decades is
starting to create a sea change in several countries around the world. Organizations
like Omidyar Network, The Skoll Foundation, Acumen Fund identify and invest in people
and organizations that have innovative ideas that can create a massive social
impact on the ground. Several of these ideas have been self sustaining after a
break even point due to the revenue model s underlying them. Several of them have focused on building local
economies and capacities in their target countries which can potentially have
spillover effects in areas outside their intended impact.
While it might be interesting to see these organizations as
nothing more than investors investing in specific organizations, this fails to
address the network created between the investor and investees. Often several
investees are connected to each other to share common stories, best practices
and ideas for overcoming challenges. An idea designed to address challenges in
agriculture in Africa could potentially be refitted to address issues of women’s
self help groups in Latin America. Often what might start as a professional partnership and sharing of ideas can evolve into a stronger source of emotional support that allows investees to persevere in the face of overwhelming odds. A key factor contributing to this would be the fact that Social Entrepreneurs might value the experiences and advice of someone who has faced a similar problem in the development space over the advice of someone who has faced the problem in the corporate space - especially given the marked difference in cultural dynamics between the two spaces.
The network that exists between these
organizations is worth studying and understanding as it enables us to
understand how ideas can originate in one country and travel to another country
and have an impact quite different from what they intended. This analysis can also
help us identify which organizations have the biggest impact networks as well
as which individuals within these networks are the most influential.
In order to carry out this study one would need to connect
to impact investors and circulate a questionnaire to them and their investees
to track significant communications between the investors, investees, the
transfer of ideas, and the forums in which key connections were made. While a master
survey can be created, I would recommend customizing each survey to each impact
investor’s networks to capture their characteristics more completely.
1 comment:
Good idea. A bit light on detail and methodology (see others.) There are some similar studies in the SN literature.
Post a Comment