Business has never faced
the type of ethical challenges that it faces in actual global economy. Today’s
complexities make people struggle in their ways to accomplish their goals, even
if those ways imply making decision in the fine line between what is good and
what is not. The big problem is that at the moment that only one employee acts
for his one personal benefit, the whole company ethics and success is
compromised. A good reputation might be the most important business’s assets.
However, it is also the easiest to loose and the most challenging to maintain.
Since employees are usually hesitant
to turn in their colleagues involved in unethical practices, the use of Social
Network Analysis could not only help organization to identify latent problems
of integrity and moral within their employee base, but also highlight the
persons with good perceptions among their coworkers.
Since integrity is associated with values
such as consistency, honesty, reliability, trustworthy, authenticity and
respectful, questions that ask for people to identify who they think can represent
those values within the organization can help to recognized subgroups of people
that is highly notice by others, but also detect isolated points that could
generate some alerts to do a further evaluation.
By asking
employees the following questions the data required to do a first analysis can
be obtained.
- Which persons in your department will you trust them a secret?
- Which persons in your department are the most reliable?
- Who you consider the most ethical person in your department?
If the questions are asked in a positive way, I believe
employees will be willing to share their opinions. Questions that look for
point out a bad behavior might not be so easy to get.
In terms of measures:
◼ Density: can
reflect how balance is the organization around integrity. At more connections
more people is perceived as acting in an ethical way.
◼
Degree: will
help to distinguish the persons more recognize in terms of integrity for their
coworkers.
◼
Eigenvector:
identify who other persons are connected with the ones more value.
◼
Isolated points: as alerts of people that need further evaluation.
The
amplified universe of global stakeholders with competing value interests and value
systems, require that companies create processes to clarify, integrate and
reinforce their ethical business conduct guidelines. In addition, to create the
right mechanisms to have a sense of what employees perceived or know about
their colleagues but don’t share with the management teams.
1 comment:
"Latent problems of Integrity"--now there's a challenge! Great idea, but the difficulty is in asking the right Qs, as you point out. That's also the key to making it have any meaning. I would have liked a more considered (and accurate) use of net measures. For instance, density isn't going to "reflect how an org. is balanced around integrity." And more connections doesn't mean people are acting more ethically, at least not without some other supporting evidence.
Post a Comment